Legislature(2015 - 2016)HOUSE FINANCE 519
04/11/2016 01:30 PM House FINANCE
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
HB118 | |
HB290 | |
HB375 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+= | HB 118 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | HB 243 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | HB 315 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | TELECONFERENCED | ||
+= | HB 290 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+= | HB 375 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HOUSE BILL NO. 118 "An Act adopting the Municipal Property Assessed Clean Energy Act; authorizing municipalities to establish programs to impose assessments for energy improvements in regions designated by municipalities; imposing fees; and providing for an effective date." Vice-Chair Saddler MOVED to ADOPT the proposed committee substitute for HB 118, Work Draft (29-GH1021\P). There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered. JANE PIERSON, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE STEVE THOMPSON, reviewed the changes to the Committee Substitute by reading from a prepared statement: Sec 1: No change Sec 2: No change Sec 3: New section allowing second class boroughs to authorize PACE financing under non area wide powers Sec 4: Renumbered section with no change Sec 5: Renumbered section with the following changes: · Page 3, line 17 Modifies language to allow PACE financing to be implemented within a region of a municipality determined by the municipality through a public process. · Page 3, lines 30 - 31 Modifies language to allow PACE financing to be implemented within a region of a municipality determined by the municipality through a public process. · Page 4, line 24 through Page 5, line 3 Replaces proposed AS 29.49.050 with language that allows a municipality wishing to authorize PACE financing to do so by designating an area of the municipality as a region for the program. The area designated may include the entire municipality, a single subset, or subsets of the municipality. However, the entire PACE program must be contained within the boundary of the municipality. · Page 5, line 15 Requires a municipality proposing to implement PACE financing to provide a description of the boundaries for the proposed program. Re-letter the remaining subsections of AS 29.49.060 with no change. · Page 6, line 17 Requires that a map of the proposed PACE financing program boundary be included in the mandatory report that must be made available to the public before a PACE program can be initiated. Renumber the remaining subsections of proposed AS 29.49.070 with no change. · Page 10, lines 9 - 10 Adds language to acknowledge that PACE assessment payments may come in from regions within the municipality. · Page 11, line 7, Page 11, line 10 and Page 11, line 13 Clarifies that the prohibited acts established in proposed AS 29.49.160 will apply to a PACE financing program whether it is offered in a portion of the municipality or the entire municipality. Ms. Pierson referred to a legal opinion (copy on file) dated April 2, 2015 in the member's backup packets. She indicated the memo explained why the changes in the Committee Substitute (CS) was necessary. 1:40:59 PM Representative Guttenberg asked what the term "municipal" encompassed. He asked whether a borough was included in the definition. Ms. Pierson believed so but deferred to Mr. Therriault for the answer. Representative Kawasaki asked about local improvement districts. He wondered whether the municipality would determine a PACE (property assessed clean energy program) area through a public process or would the municipal government act on behalf of the property owners. 1:42:28 PM GENE THERRIAULT, DEPUTY DIRECTOR, STATEWIDE ENERGY POLICY DEVELOPMENT, ALASKA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AND EXPORT AUTHORITY, ALASKA ENERGY AUTHORITY, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, answered Representative Kawasaki's question. He explained that the public process was delineated in the legislation. When a municipality was considering a PACE program it must pass a resolution detailing the location and how the program would be run. The information would be included in a public report and ultimately, a local government had to adopt an ordinance to initiate the program. Representative Guttenberg asked about the term "municipality" used in the legislation and wondered what the term encompassed. Mr. Therriault had consulted with the Department of Law (DOL) and assured that the terminology in the bill "struck the balance correctly." 1:44:20 PM Representative Wilson offered that the bill provided additional power to a second class borough. She wondered whether the municipality then had the ability to add a tax to the PACE area. Mr. Therriault responded in the negative. He explained that the program allowed an individual property owner to use the financing mechanism and repay the loan through a voluntary property tax assessment. He noted that the mechanism was similar to a utility assessment except that the assessment was only levied for the individual property owner in the program. He emphasized that the bill allowed for a contractual arrangement between a property owner and municipality to levy an extra assessment on the individual's property in order to repay the loan. Representative Wilson asked whether the legislation was expanded to include residents. Mr. Therriault responded that the bill restricted the PACE program to businesses rather than residents. He added that in the Fairbanks North Star Borough the program was intended to assist businesses convert to natural gas when an expanded supply was available. He delineated that some states were attempting to expand the program to residential properties and experienced problems with the secondary lending market purchasers of residential property loans. The authority decided to avoid any issues with residential property and focused on businesses. Representative Wilson asked whether the program was a voluntary mechanism rather than any type of "forceful action." Mr. Therriault replied that the program was completely voluntary for both the municipality and the individual businesses. Representative Gattis communicated that the program applied to the building owner rather than the business owner unless they were the same. She viewed the program as advantageous to both the business and property owner. Representative Munoz asked whether the municipality was the entity repaying the lending institution. Mr. Therriault confirmed that if the source of the loan was a private bank that entered into a contractual agreement with the municipality then the local government would pay the bank. Another mechanism a municipality could employ would be a revenue bond that would be repaid via the local government. The program allowed the local government the flexibility to search for federal sources of money, private lenders, or revenue bonding at low interest rates and pass the opportunity on to the business owner. 1:50:16 PM Co-Chair Thompson OPENED public testimony. 1:50:34 PM KATHY WASSERMAN, ALASKA MUNICIPAL LEAGUE, spoke in favor of the legislation. She added that under state law the term "municipalities" included boroughs and cities. The league strongly supported the legislation as a tool that helped businesses and included "safeguards." 1:51:58 PM KARL KASSEL, MAYOR, FAIRBANKS NORTHSTAR BOROUGH (via teleconference), urged members to support HB 118. He strongly endorsed the legislation. He noted the support of the communities and mayors of Fairbanks and North Pole. He voiced that the bill helped businesses move forward with cleaner energy and gas conversions as well as fostering an economic "boost" for the communities. Co-Chair Thompson CLOSED public testimony. Mr. Therriault relayed that in the past year AEA and AIEDEA had been looking for additional non-state sources of money that could assist energy conversion in the state. He relayed that according to Senator Murkowski's office, the Rural Utility Service (RUS) division of the United States Department of Agriculture was in the process of writing a letter of support. The RUS approved the PACE mechanism as one of the favored programs to access federal loan funds. He reported that AEA was actively looking and identified a source of funding with a zero interest rate for a local government and another that carried a 2 percent to 2.5 percent interest rate. Vice-Chair Saddler asked who was offering the zero percent interest rate. Mr. Therriault responded that RUS was offering a zero percent interest rate loan and the pool of money nationwide was $70 million to $80 million. He stressed the importance for municipalities to obtain access to repayment mechanisms that lowered the default rate on loans. Vice-Chair Saddler reviewed the new zero fiscal note from the Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development (DCCED). Vice-Chair Saddler MOVED to REPORT CSHB 118 (FIN) out of committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal note(s). There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered. CSHB 118 (FIN) was REPORTED out of committee with a "do pass" recommendation and with a new zero fiscal note by the Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development. 1:56:57 PM AT EASE 1:59:00 PM RECONVENED
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|---|---|
HB 118 AEA Graphic.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2016 1:30:00 PM |
HB 118 |